Collection

Kitāb al-Ghayba

1,241 narrations 77 chapters

Two books on the occultation under one heading, and this page holds both. Al-Nuʿmānī (d. c. 360/971) wrote the earlier, within living memory of the shorter occultation, gathering the reports that the concealment had been foretold. Al-Ṭūsī (d. 460/1067) wrote the later in Baghdad a century further on, when the doctrine was under sustained attack, and his purpose is argument as much as collection: he sets out the reports, reasons from them, then answers opponents directly — that a leader nobody can reach is no leader, that the concealment has lasted too long, that the accounts conflict. He documents the four deputies and the claimants he rejects, and collects earlier cases of concealment among prophets to argue the pattern is not new.

Chapters

About this collection

Kitāb al-Ghayba

Two separate books on the occultation of the twelfth Imam, gathered here under one heading. The earlier is by Muḥammad b. Ibrāhīm al-Nuʿmānī (d. c. 360/971), a student of al-Kulaynī, written while the shorter occultation was still within living memory; the later is by Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-Ṭūsī (d. 460/1067), written in Baghdad roughly a century further on. Together they run to 1,241 narrations across 77 chapters in this edition.

Al-Nuʿmānī’s concern is that the concealment was foretold rather than improvised: he assembles the reports in which the Prophet and the Imams are said to have announced a ghayba in advance, and warns his readers against being unsettled by something already described to them. Al-Ṭūsī writes under different pressure. By his time the doctrine had been under attack for a century — that a leader nobody can reach is no leader, that the concealment had outlasted any reasonable span, that the accounts contradict one another — and his book answers those objections directly, reasoning from the narrations rather than only listing them.

Al-Ṭūsī also documents the four deputies of the shorter occultation and the men who claimed that office and were repudiated, which makes his half the principal source for the institutional history of the period. Both authors collect earlier concealments among the prophets, to argue that the pattern is not new.